Stacking but not sure about tilting
I've been scoring fairly well lately, but mainly because I'm playing smarter and my short game is a bit tighter. My shot making is sometimes good, sometimes bad, including my driving, and it has been annoying me.
Therefore, over the past day or so, I've been looking again at Stack & Tilt, not because I want to adopt the method or system or whatever it has been called, but because I think it does offer some interesting and helpful thoughts on how the average golfer can play more consistent golf.
It's the Stack part of the equation that most interests me, putting and keeping the weight on the front foot during the golf swing. The Tilt part is, in my view, an obsolete term because in some respects, and in some new interpretations and implementations of S&T, there now seems to be less tilt than in the original 'model'.
The key thing about Stack is that it eliminates the need, contrary to a lot of golf instruction, to move a lot of one's weight to the back foot, the so called loading of the swing, before transferring it back to the front foot. This transfer of weight is, again in my view, one of the major causes of inconsistent ball striking in the game. The S&T advocates cite consistent bottom of the swing position (or words to that effect) as a key objective.
Professional golfers and good amateurs, who hit thousands of golf balls, have the skill and the time to develop the timing needed to achieve this back and forward weight transfer and hit the ball in the same part of the down swing time after time. The average player does not have this skill or timing, and contacts the ball differently almost every time.
By stacking the weight on the front foot and basically keeping it there, albeit adding some weight to it just before and at impact, there is much better chance for the average player to make good ball contact. It should be noted that this assumes one subscribes to the view that the ball must be struck before the ground for most iron and hybrid shots.
I'm fairly sure that this approach works quite well for fairway woods as well because plenty of average players have more trouble with topping their fairway woods than chunking them. Of course, ball position and a range of other swing factors will come into play, so a period of trial and error will be needed for everyone.
Using a stacking approach for the driver is a slightly different kettle of fish. There is evidence to suggest that it is necessary to hit up on drives, not down, in order to maximise distance. The S&T people address this issue by suggesting that more hip slide is needed with a driver and slightly different club positioning (check out the relevant 'academy' website for details). This is not something I've experimented with so far, but it is an important issue.
Suffice to say, weight on the front foot at impact is a concept that is ignored by the majority of average golfers, despite the evidence of their eyes in watching good golfers on TV and elsewhere. My previously espoused fundamentals of weight on the front foot, no sway and no over-hitting fit nicely with some of the S&T principles, so I'm happy to endorse the approach in general terms, and continue to work on my own ball-striking consistency.
By the way, I read recently that S&T is in many ways an extension of well-established short game set up and swing principles and I think this is absolutely correct - weight on the front foot, quiet wrists (straight arms) and swinging with control (no forcing).
A second by the way: I'm not convinced that any particular 'method' or 'system' is going to work for anyone or everyone. However, there are individual ideas or concepts that are often worth a try. The main thing is that whatever the idea or concept, it must be 'practical;, that is, it must be something that can be applied, and applied with relatively much less effort and time than is available to the average player. Trying to implement complex swing concepts that relate to the swings of top-line players is often useless and often counter-productive, which is why most 'tips' simply don't work.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home